TRANSPARENCY

Evidence & methodology

Strong statements require a clear basis. This page explains how Eyonis determines security, cost and support potential and where the limits of comparison lie.

Methodology status: September 2026
01 · BASELINE

Every comparison starts with the current environment

We record users, systems, applications, contracts, operating effort, incidents and support tickets. Potential is calculated only against this documented baseline.

02 · SECURITY INDEX

Up to 98% higher security effect

The internal risk index evaluates attack surface, access protection, patch status, isolation, backup and recovery, monitoring and data flows. It is a planning model, not a prediction of incidents.

03 · TOTAL COST

Up to 80% lower IT costs

The comparison uses a 36-month total-cost view including hardware, licences, maintenance, administration, support and quantifiable downtime. Actual savings depend on the starting environment.

04 · SUPPORT LOAD

Up to 90% fewer tickets

Ticket volume per 100 users before migration is compared with a stable operating period after migration. Changes in user numbers and application scope are normalised.

05 · 100-USER MODEL

From 8,000 to 10 risk points

The figures describe the aggregated internal risk score of a reference environment with 100 users before and after the Eyonis target architecture. They are neither incident counts nor probabilities.

06 · SOVEREIGNTY

Controlled data flows

The target model is designed without data exchange with US services. Customer-selected third-party applications may create exceptions and are documented during the assessment.

SECURITY ARCHITECTURE

End-to-end protection for client and server

Eyonis combines strict separation, least privilege, controlled administration, encryption, monitoring, backup and recovery. “Military grade” describes the security principles used and is not presented as a formal government or military certification.

VALIDATION

How your individual values are determined

1

Assessment

Current costs, systems, tickets and risks are documented.

2

Comparison

The baseline is compared with the defined Eyonis target model.

3

Written result

Assumptions, scope, potential and exceptions are recorded transparently.

Request an individual assessment